A Plaintiffs’ Employment Law Firm]operating on a contingency fee basis.
Counsel has sparse knowledge of ediscovery concepts and issues and needs to understand the law on sanctions in California as well as the facts required to support a sanctions motion in a matter where the opposing party failed to preserve and produce key ESI despite being on notice of its duty to preserve.
Use Issue tags and search filters in eDiscovery Assistant’s curated case law database to find and review relevant decisions including:
Time savings – eliminated several hours of research time and cost with system’s ability to drill directly into case law on the issues for the motion.
Eliminated need to filter through case law to find discovery decisions; curated database means searches are hitting on relevant discovery decisions.
Eliminated need to know search terms or language court uses in sifting through case law.
Ability to use case law and checklist to outline motion.
eDiscovery Assistant allowed the Firm to get to the case law needed to understand the appropriate sanctions available under California law based on the facts of the case. We also saved the Firm hours of time by leveraging the issue tagging in the platform that drove them directly to decisions on each of the individual issues they faced, and the platform allowed them to store that research in a very organized fashion with the Cite Lists that they shared within their case team.
With so many open tasks and issues, leveraging eDiscovery Assistant paid for its annual cost several times over on just one motion.
Founded in 2016 and developed by attorneys who practice eDiscovery 24 hours per day 7 days per week, eDiscovery Assistant includes curated database of case law, rules, checklists and forms, and glossary of terms.